Uncategorized – Polymath Life

Fake Gurus in Online Business And HustlePorn Grifters

Polymathmind — Sun, 13 Dec 2020 10:54:00 +0000

BThe rise of the fake gurus in online business resulted in the rise of… conversations about the rise of the fake gurus in online business, as well as hustle porn grifters. Who are these “gurus” and are they fake, really?

A little known fact about my online business background is that I’ve taken numerous courses and masterclasses/webinars, analyzed and followed nearly 200 (yes, you read that right) digital marketing and general business coaches and businesses. When I spent several weeks this past summer cleaning up my multiple email accounts from nearly 100,000 emails I no longer needed/wanted (yes, weeks; it put my appreciation of time on a whole new level), I had an opportunity to sort them by their names and actually get a pretty solid overview of what they are about. So my opinion on the legit vs fake guru subject matter is supported by my comparison of these “commercial creatures” in the online space.

Mei senserit assentior at, altera delenit cum cu, his ex ridens assentior. Sea ei novum integre omittantur, quas commodo admodum ad mel. Mel vidit aliquando at, mei possit menandri disputationi id, duo autem assueverit eu. At mea enim ipsum verterem, eripuit detraxit ne sed. Ut discere aliquam feugiat eam, illum dolores scaevola mea ne. Vivendo laboramus te pri, ut dico ridens instructior vix. Discere eripuit euismod eu nam, cu qui tale verear pertinax. Eu modus meliore mediocrem cum, solet affert probatus an vix.

No debet cotidieque sit. Usu lobortis philosophia ex, nostro maiestatis eum no. Ad pro latine comprehensam. Pri quis erant laudem an, et vix propriae omnesque delicatissimi. Ei pro autem quidam perpetua. No debet cotidieque sit. Usu lobortis philosophia ex, nostro maiestatis eum no. Ad pro latine comprehensam. Pri quis erant laudem an, et vix propriae omnesque delicatissimi.u00a0

Fashion trendsetting styles on Gawker

Soul Meets Weather: Developing An Alignment

Polymathmind — Fri, 04 Dec 2020 11:07:00 +0000

Developing an alignment with the weather is pretty sweet. I rarely track these but normally, the night before a snowfall, I see snowflakes in my visions.Very short episodes but really pretty.Usually but not always, right as I’m about to fall asleep or right before waking up.The timing is, of course, easily explainable because every human has their own biorhythm that can be mathematically calculated. And every human has only specific hours in a day/night when they can effectively enter the astral zone that will provide accurate info (vs mixed with illusions etc). So my channeling usually happens during exact time periods that I was able to mathematically calculate.Actually, I’m still one of the only people in North America who can calculate it using a numerology system from Russia that has not yet been translated to English. Being somewhat obsessed with scientific esoterics has its advantages.It is a revolutionary methodology that can significantly improve kids’ well-being, from behavior to health.Because when a parent enforces activities onto a child during low energy times, they unknowingly harm their child. Creating a biorhythmic chart for a child is crucial and one day, I will certainly be encouraging parents to get it done. The chart will also help breastfeeding mothers to get aligned with their child’s healthy feeding and sleeping schedule and help the mother herself to feel less tired while raising her kid.How did I go from snowflakes to motherhood? Lol That is another story. You’ll need to study the inner workings of a Gemini Moon in a natal chart to get a better understanding. Never a dull moment with this Gem Moon over here, that’s for sure .

Fashion trendsetting styles on Gawker

From Compulsive Learning To Conscious Manifesting

Polymathmind — Wed, 02 Dec 2020 10:51:00 +0000

My days used to consist of me developing my mind via compulsive learning in various fields and doing nearly everything that would be considered “the hard way” ie doing it all on your own and fixing incompetent people’s mistakes. And having dealt with many people, including hired, there sure are many who struggle even with the simplest instructions.

Now my days consist of me sending direct instructions to the Higher Forces and receiving answers, guidance, assistance and pure joy from anything I touch with my mind or physical action.

They also come with me often recording time stamps of my insights for tracking purposes and data collection. I treat my psychic contacts as data-based science.

For example, the other day I sent in a “request” for a title for an upcoming creative project, because I needed to add it to one of the websites I’m building. Since I haven’t really cared much to focus on that title since summer 2019, it occurred to me that now it’s time.

I also had a specific requirement based on numerology where I wanted the title’s sum of each letter (converted to numbers) to equal a particular number. Sounds a bit unnecessarily complex and obsessive perhaps, right?

Well, within about 10 minutes of sending in my request via my “radio”, I was pulled to check some synonyms of a word that came to my mind. When the Google search showed me numerous results, I instantly recognized the word that sparked my curiosity. I quickly calculated the sum of its letters and… you guessed it… it was the exact number I had requested in my requirements. Boom! What normally could take people long annoying hours/days/weeks/months to figure out because something just doesn’t click took me 10 minutes. Thank you, Universe!

And this is how I build strategies in 2020. In McDonald’s tagline, “I’m loving it!”

Your spiritual strategist, Salt.

And to those who ever thought I do it all alone: no, I always have the highest form of help available to mankind. You can never really do it “alone”, either. There is always help from above.

People just choose to accept it or not. You either accept it from questionable people who haven’t spent decades on developing their mind and hence can’t even pack 2 SIM cards into a shipping package when they say they would, instead of 1 (how hard can it be, seriously, Freedom Mobile, looking at you?) or you accept it from the highest source possible. I chose the latter. And never looked back. Life is so much more exciting, too, now, when you know that your “radio” is always on ready to take new requests from you.

Fashion trendsetting styles on Gawker

A Polymath’s Response to Vandalism During BLM Protests

Polymathmind — Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:47:00 +0000

In mid-July 2020 I published on my Instagram my response to vandalism and looting during otherwise peaceful BLM protests. 3 months later, in mid-October 2020, I stumbled upon an article in the Washington Post that discusses The Monkey Cage’s research into those BLM protests. The Monkey Cage is

At TMC, political scientists draw on their expertise and the discipline’s research to provide in-depth analysis, illuminate the news, and inform civic discussion. We want the political conversation to include timely, accessible, and sound knowledge from a publicly oriented political science discipline, and to be less dominated by evidence-free arguments.

TMC is an independent site currently published here at the Washington Post.

Who can write for TMC?

We publish political scientists, usually in universities or comparable research positions, writing about their particular area of expertise. Occasionally we publish pieces by scholars in affiliated disciplines — such as sociology, economics, psychology, or history — if their contributions are relevant to politics.

So before I use The Monkey Cage’s findings to demonstrate the hypocrisy with respect to the perception of statistics that may or may not benefit a particular narrative, I’d like to share with you that response from my Instagram post. Please try not to project your assumptions onto me and put labels onto me while trying to stick me into the pro or anti-BLM categories. I am guided by a different set of principles and beliefs that go beyond a 2-option-only mentality. So if I happen to criticize certain people’s behaviours, it doesn’t automatically mean that my response is in any way racist. Of course, you’re entitled to think whatever it is you want to think, but I am clear on this: this opinion is related strictly to people who engage in vandalism activities and include people of all colours.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/10/16/this-summers-black-lives-matter-protesters-were-overwhelming-peaceful-our-research-finds/

Fashion trendsetting styles on Gawker

The data that The Monkey Cage found and discussed in their article, was based on the 7,305 events they had collected.

First, police made arrests in 5 percent of the protest events, with over 8,500 reported arrests (or possibly more). Police used tear gas or related chemical substances in 2.5 percent of these events.

Protesters or bystanders were reported injured in 1.6 percent of the protests. In total, at least three Black Lives Matter protesters and one other person were killed while protesting in Omaha, Austin and Kenosha, Wis. One anti-fascist protester killed a far-right group member during a confrontation in Portland, Ore.; law enforcement killed the alleged assailant several days later.

Police were reported injured in 1 percent of the protests. A law enforcement officer killed in California was allegedly shot by supporters of the far-right “boogaloo” movement, not anti-racism protesters. The killings in the line of duty of other law enforcement officers during this period were not related to the protests.

Only 3.7 percent of the protests involved property damage or vandalism. Some portion of these involved neither police nor protesters, but people engaging in vandalism or looting alongside the protests.

In short, our data suggest that 96.3 percent of events involved no property damage or police injuries, and in 97.7 percent of events, no injuries were reported among participants, bystanders or police.

These figures should correct the narrative that the protests were overtaken by rioting and vandalism or violence. Such claims are false. Incidents in which there was protester violence or property destruction should be regarded as exceptional — and not representative of the uprising as a whole.

In many instances, police reportedly began or escalated the violence, but some observers nevertheless blame the protesters. The claim that the protests are violent — even when the police started the violence — can help local, state and federal forces justify intentionally beating, gassing or kettling the people marching, or reinforces politicians’ calls for “law and order.”

Given that protesters were objecting to extrajudicial police killings of Black citizens, protesters displayed an extraordinary level of nonviolent discipline, particularly for a campaign involving hundreds of documented incidents of apparent police brutality. The protests were extraordinarily nonviolent, and extraordinarily nondestructive, given the unprecedented size of the movement’s participation and geographic scope.

This is important because public perceptions of the legitimacy of protests vs. policing have had fairly immediate effects on election outcomes and public policy. Those perceptions affect public attitudes toward movements for years.

Further, authoritarian leaders almost always try to treat protesters as criminals and to delegitimize their claims by exaggerating any incidents of violence and property destruction. These narrative techniques shore up support for broad-based repression against these groups, at little political cost to the autocrat.

In the case of Black Lives Matter, such claims are not only cynical, they are false.

The Social Dilemma Documentary Review And Other Thoughts

Polymathmind — Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:53:00 +0000

I realize that my way of living includes placing the future in line with the present so perhaps this is why this film seems to have less impact on me personally than on most other people.

I didn’t really see anything eye-opening because everything that was discussed in the film is what I’ve intuitively known for a long time. But I also feel like I’m not the only one around me who kinda knew, too. Especially in the digital marketing circles.

Being a marketer myself, I’m on both sides of social media – as a personal user, and as a business advertiser. I see the pros and cons of the platforms from both sides, and over the years have tried to use them strategically while staying emotionally detached, unlike many of the less consciously aware people targetted by Facebook.

I cannot begin to count the number of people in my own newsfeed over the years who voiced their discontent over the fact that such a small amount of people react to their posts (validation dependency alert as discussed in The Social Dilemma).

Asking people to “comment if you see this post” and complaining that their “friends” aren’t supporting their businesses that they try to use their personal Facebook page for, has always looked comical in my eyes.

You are complaining about an algorithm that decides what limited number of people sees your content! And you are sad that only 10 people liked your post vs 100 that some Mary or Jane got for theirs.

But now you know that they got targeted by a certain type of advertisers hence Facebook pushed their post in front of more eyes who’d be eager to see the adverts.

What use for Facebook is Lera Salt’s posts about astrology predictions if astrology businesses don’t YET spend enough money on the platform??!! (The spiritual services industry is an over 2 billion dollar industry but it is still largely dominated by unpaid promos).

It’s not that Lera’s following/social influence dropped if her posts now suddenly get 10-20 reactions but that Facebook doesn’t see her as a highly profitable source anymore. It’s that simple.

Why does Lera often hold off on jumping onto the latest “news” share or social buzz train and just observes people ‘s behavior for awhile before making a post about it? Because the faster she was to join the “party”, the more conditioned for following the algorithm’s function she’d become. It’s that simple.

When you are dependent on the number of people who validate your posts, you are being shown your own FEARS. Fears of not being good enough, of not being successful enough, of not being important enough for the society or your circle, and of living your life unnoticed. All because instead of discovering your purpose, your calling in life, you focus on discovering new ways to beat the algorithm and human psychology.

Fashion trendsetting styles on Gawker

I’ll let you in on a little “secret”.

In esoterics ie the hidden wisdom, when your social circles seem to drop off, when you look as though you think or behave differently, when it feels as though you keep paddling against the current, that is the key moment when your life is about to change.

And whether that inevitable change is for the better will depend on your level of self-awareness and ability to hear yourself vs everyone else on the planet.

Because as an individual you weren’t created to follow Facebook’s algorithm. You were created to follow a totally different kind of algorithm that is built into your own soul and karmic past.

We are all programmed. But the program I’m talking about is not social conditioning-related. It’s on a soul level.

And if you go against your soul’s and karmic program, that is where you start getting physically sick. Yes, physical sicknesses have a lot to do with your soul’s program.

And when you pile on Facebook’s own program on top of yours, you will have a much harder time hearing yourself and avoiding the particular kind of physical illness that was pre-programmed in you at the time of your entrance into this body.

Learn to use social media as your strategic tool, and not as your program controller.

Photo: eyes from Ancient Egypt. More fascinating than the eyes that spy on you on Facebook, IMO.

Introducing Lucas: My White Privileged Foster Cat

Polymathmind — Tue, 19 May 2020 11:10:26 +0000

Bed ut perspiciatis, unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam eaque ipsa, quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt, explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem, quia voluptas sit, aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos, qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt, neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum, quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, Sed ut perspiciatis, unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam eaque ipsa, quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt, explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem, quia voluptas sit, aspernatur aut odit aut fugit.

Fashion trendsetting styles on Gawker

12 things that shouldn’t work but do

Polymathmind — Thu, 14 May 2020 12:45:26 +0000